Since the advent of the web, technologies around the globe are advancing far too quickly. The internet continues to play a significant role in advancing technology and influencing alterations in social cognition. Many people believe that the internet has made a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge and study. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” – this question was asked by Nicholas Carr in his publication. It is crucial to understand that while technology is necessary for society, there is concern that it would somehow harm human growth. In this essay, the discussion will try to refute the claim that Google is making humanity stupid.
Technology advancements and the expansion of knowledge would require the appropriate instruments to succeed. Therefore, technology-based solutions are needed to provide simple access to, development, and spread of knowledge. It is unsupportable to claim that a technology that makes information accessible is dumbing down people’s minds in order to enhance the same corpus of knowledge. It is observed that research is an ongoing and important process (Carr). It calls for academics and scholars to connect distinct bodies of information with the goal of improving it. Technology-based solutions that support this process are, therefore, vitally crucial. Science has conducted extensive studies and made sweeping forecasts about what may go wrong as technology develops. People have experienced this terror since they were little (Rothman). Parents have frequently demonstrated their dread of technology by telling their children what to view, listen to, and interact with. In fact, many who contest the degree to which Google has advanced knowledge do so in the belief that it has moved to stifle public dialogue. They contend that considering an answer is no longer necessary because one can just “Google” the solution (Makridakis 54). However, the opportunity to find answers easily enriches knowledge. It contributes to the constant development of worldview and cognition. Such a state of affairs is a great foundation for global advancement in every instance. Google is a technology that assists millions of people around the world.
At this point, it seems reasonable to turn to the psychological side of the issue. Specifically, how Google affects the mental state of an individual. Simply having access to data at the press of a button is not indicative of mental inactivity. Rather, it can be argued that the concept of utilizing a search tool is self-fulfilling. Fundamentally, neither a foolish mind nor someone who wants to narrow their comprehension can use the internet in search of information. It could be crucial that one states the main purpose for which the search tool was created. Since early in history, there has been a demand for quicker information availability. It might be necessary to point out that if ignorance exists, people are ultimately accountable for it and that Google is not the only cause of it. Then, research demands moral and academic commitment (Carr). No longer is it acceptable for someone to bring someone else’s work for marking. Individuals have been delivering their study material at different levels for many years. However, their ownership has long been questioned. Since there was no system in effect to verify the validity and uniqueness of the mentioned materials, these presentations remained unreported. For many, this contributed to a psychological barrier to sharing their original ideas and works online (Rothman). Google now takes a position that allows for quicker access to and transit through any type of material and information that has already been accomplished by other academics. It is important to remember that plagiarism is a corporate and academic offense that is not tolerated in the domains of study.
The purpose of search tools is to make knowledge more accessible. This has a significant impact on protecting academics from the negative effects of time waste. Traditionally, it took too long to find data, analyze, and deliver it. This caused the information to move more slowly than intended. It implies that technology instruments must be made affordable, accessible, and effective. This noble route should be pursued as the diffusion of knowledge has aided in the birth of various breakthroughs through imaginative thinking. Google embodies a struggle that many people have experienced (Rothman). It accomplishes this goal in a convenient way. It still reminds one of the processes of leafing through thick ancient volumes to find a particular reference, word, or phrase. This search engine should be considered a tool that makes it easier to discover information quickly and easily (Carr). The breadth and methodology of traditional methods of information search have also been constrained. It is crucial to consider how this search engine has required people to create and combine diverse pieces of information in order to produce a singular piece. People may now access a variety of materials. This includes books, papers, journals, and other sources. Academicians’ growth and progress cannot be reliant on the physically demanding and time-consuming study of physical knowledge.
Thus, although it might be true that people have become less engaged in their thinking as a result of the accessibility of information, this accessibility has allowed for a successful expansion of knowledge. Google has played a crucial role in making pertinent information available immediately. As a result, it is not always true that Google is only a tool for attaining important goals rather than a goal unto itself.
Works Cited
Carr, Nicolas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic, Web.
Makridakis, Spyros. The Forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution: Its Impact on Society and Firms. Futures, vol. 90., 2017, pp. 46–60.
Rothman, Lily. 20 Years Of Google Has Changed the Way We Think. Here’s How, According to a Historian of Information. Time, Web.