Introduction
In the past years, world scholars and researchers have highly debated the field of biomedical research. One of the main issues under concern has been the use of animals in facilitating biochemical research. The discussion concerning the use of animal testing in biomedical research has been very informative. The discussion is very relevant in addressing the topic of biomedical research in the sense that it has addressed all issues concerning the use of animals. The discussion seeks to clear the controversy concerning the use of animal testing as well as offer a green light on the efficiency in using animal testing. It offers a persuasive and informative discourse to the readers. It has been very efficient in persuading and informing the readers concerning the advantages of using animal testing in biochemical research. The discussion has divided people into three groups concerning their perceptions of animal testing. These include those who see the use of animals as a norm, those who consider animal testing as inadmissible & violent action, and the third group that is ignorant about animal testing. In this case, the paper persuades and inform the readers to change their attitudes towards animals and give the strategies that I used to evaluate disaster preparedness (PSA), testing and abandoning their outdated perceptions
Rhetorical Purpose, Audience and the Logic of the Disaster Preparedness
The discussion and analysis on the use of animal testing in biomedical research are direct to the wider society. The paper targets a group of people who have a negative perception of animal testing. It is worth noting that the negative perceptions concerning the issue of animal testing have not been a problem to the whole society in the modern world. This makes it worthwhile to address the whole society by informing and persuading them to change their attitudes. The paper also narrows its attention to biomedical researchers and practitioners, whereby it seeks to expand their understanding of the use of animal testing. In this case, scientists in the biomedical field are required to be more vigorous in examining the issue of animal testing in biomedical research. Scientists should be more professional in their research and cease mockery and violent methods in research.
Relevancy
I have presented the issue of the use of animals in biomedical research in a very logical manner. In this case, I have an adequate justification for the need for adopting animals in the biochemical research that I have provided. Notably, the use of animals in biochemical research is highly advantageous. The use of animals has led to the saving of many lives that would have otherwise been lost. This makes the use of animals for biomedical testing not only ethical but also advantageous in saving lives. The use of animal testing has helped scientists to learn more about health problems thus assuring the safety of new medical treatments. It is worth noting that animal testing makes it possible for the examination of health problems and diseases learned in living organisms.
The use of animals in biomedical research is highly advantageous in the sense that it has helped in many medical discoveries. A good example is the discovery of insulin, vaccines, and different antibiotics. In the treatment of cancer and HIV, animal testing also offers great assistance thus making it highly useful. It is worth noting that the closure of the use of animal testing may lead to the termination of many projects that save human life. Based on these insights there is a demonstration of the logic and ethics in the use of animal testing in biochemical research. The research outcomes based on animal testing have led to a breakthrough in the health sector. This is so because significant discoveries have been attained using animal testing, which would have otherwise been impossible. Based on these insights, there is every need to adopt and advocate for the use of animal testing.
The concept of animal testing is very timely and relevant in the modern world. This is in consideration of the height of diseases and health complications in contemporary society. Based on the increase in population and the high awareness of human health, there is every need to adopt more efficient and safe research procedures. The use of animal testing precisely addresses this issue, thus justifying its relevance. In regards to ethics, the discomfort of a few animals is not comparable with the many lives saved. The significant improvement in the quality of human life justifies the need for its adoption. On the contrary, critiques of the use of animal testing have said it is ethically wrong. In order to make the use of animal testing more appropriate, scientists should be steadfast in devising methods that will reduce the pain on animals. This is so because animals too feel pain, thus the need to devise methods that do not instill much pain.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis and discussion of the use of animal testing in biomedical research, there has been evidence of significant improvements in human life. The use of animal testing has led to substantial discoveries in human medical research, thus improving human life. The logical and persuasiveness of the topic presentation highly enhances its reception. In the paper, there is an adequate presentation of the concept of ethics and logic behind the use of animal testing. With this in mind, the paper is very informative and clears all the controversy concerning the topic of animal testing. It, therefore, recommended the group that had a negative perception towards animal testing have a change of mind.