The Earth’s surface continues to heat steadily year to year. The upsurge in carbon dioxide gas emissions from living things is to blame for these problems, which have resulted in health, environmental, and humanist implications. The struggle against climatic change alterations is a real chance to generate employment, innovative thinking, and social equity in the United States and worldwide. People are likely to face the main danger of this century from climate change. Besides, despite the many causes and consequences of global warming, solutions to the problem remain a challenging aspect. The long-term alteration of weather patterns and ecosystems is a hallmark of global warming, resulting from an increase in the world’s average global heating rate. The increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases contributes to the escalation of the greenhouse effect (Solar Impulse Foundation). As a result of the greenhouse effect, the Earth’s temperature intensifies. However, human activity is directly responsible for the increase in greenhouse gases. In light of these findings, it is no surprising fact that the globe’s leading climatologists believe human actions have been largely responsible for the upsurge in global temperatures since the mid-20th century (Selin). There are numerous ways Americans’ views on climate change differ from those based on scientific evidence. There is a wide range of opinions on what is causing it when it comes to climate change. Most US residents believe that human activities are the core cause of climatic changes. In contrast, in is estimated that Earth’s warming results from natural processes or that there is no proof of heating up at all.
Both policymakers and individuals have differing opinions on the impacts of global warming and the best ways to combat it. For instance, compared to the Liberal Democrats, the Conservative Republicans are less likely to believe that climate variation will have negative consequences or that proposed solutions will significantly mitigate the associated consequences. Liberal Democrats, on the other hand, believe that a wide range of policy options can make a significant difference in reducing the adverse impacts of climatic change (Solar Impulse Foundation). People who are more concerned about climate change, regardless of political affiliation, are more likely to see the significant consequences of global warming. A large majority of this group believes that policy solutions to combat global warming can be effective (Selin). According to Americans who believe that humankind’s activities are the main cause of universal climatic change, these impacts are more likely to occur than those who believe that climate change occurs naturally and there is no substantiation of climate change.
As developed countries were not required to reduce their emissions to sign on to the Kyoto Protocol, elected leaders in the United States rejected the agreement. But no mandatory limits were set on greenhouse emissions by federal policy in the United States, and the country’s carbon output rose by over 16% between 1990 and 2005 (Selin). Because of the federal government’s inaction, many states in the United States developed their climate action plans and implemented various legislative and administrative measures to reduce emissions. To name a few: limiting power plant emissions, mandating a set threshold of power generated from renewable sources, creating emission and fuel standards for cars, adopting “green building” standards, and more. In terms of dealing with climate change, liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans are poles apart.
Power station emission restrictions, international treaties on emissions, tougher fuel economy standards for vehicles, and taxation policies that encourage firms to manage pollution arising from their operations are among the standard procedures Liberal Democrats consider can make a big difference in the effort to address climate change (Solar Impulse Foundation). Nearly half of liberal Democrats believe that individual initiatives to reduce the carbon footprint of normal activities and much more individuals who drive hybrid vehicles can significantly impact global warming. Conservative Republicans, on the other hand, are principally skeptical about the options (Selin). The vast majority of conservative Republicans believe that none of these initiatives will impact climate change. Some conservative Republicans believe that each would have a significant impact.
Societies need to find a way to radically transform their energy use trends to balance and favor less emission renewable energy, logistics, forest management, and land use to resolve climate change and global warming. Many countries are taking on this dilemma, and there are numerous ways that individuals can help as well. When it comes to purchasing power produced from renewable sources, consumers have more choices (Selin). The use of more energy-efficient automobiles, taking advantage of the available transit available there, and switching to much more effective energy household items are all examples of additional ways individuals can reduce their greenhouse gas emissions while saving money. Improved home insulation, good awareness of home heating and cooling, and purchasing and recycling more environmentally friendly products are just a few options available to individuals.
Solar Impulse Foundation. Global Warming: Solutions to Solve Global Warming. solarimpulse.com, 2021.
Selin, Henrik. Global Warming and Public Policy. Saving Earth | Encyclopedia Britannica, www.britannica.com, 2019.