Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine

Cite this

Electric motors are more efficient than gas engines. They have been found to be about 90% efficient (Bockarjova and Steg 279). It implies that an electric vehicle utilizes almost all the power that it receives. On the other hand, a gas engine burns fossil fuel, producing a lot of heat that goes into waste. Individuals opposed to electric cars argue that motors are not as powerful as gas engines. However, Tesla Motors have proved them wrong. The company has manufactured electric vehicles that travel at speeds almost equal to those of gas-driven automobiles (Bockarjova and Steg 281).

Cut 15% OFF your first order
We’ll deliver a custom Environment paper tailored to your requirements with a good discount
Use discount
322 specialists online

The current capabilities of electric motors, coupled with the need for environmental conservation calls for people to consider moving to electric cars. Critics of electric automobiles argue that one should consider what the vehicles used to generate electricity (Buekers et al. 29). Some allege that electric car manufacturers use coal to produce electricity, a move that contributes to environmental pollution. Nevertheless, they fail to acknowledge that the majority of the electric vehicle companies have turned to using solar and wind turbines to generate electricity. The fact that some cars may use electric power generated from coal should not deter people from purchasing electric automobiles.

Individuals who drive electric cars are more environmental-conscious than those who use vehicles powered by diesel. Buekers et al. hold that the drivers are likely to encourage utility companies to use sources of energy that are environmentally friendly (31). Holland et al. maintain, “Electric cars are pushing the transition to a more sustainable energy grid” (3708). Those who advocate the continued use of gas engines fail to appreciate that fossil fuel is a major contributor to environmental pollution. Exploration of gas and oil entails the use of heavy machines, which emit a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Additionally, the mining of crude oil involves the use of gas-driven machines that pollute the environment (Manzetti and Mariasiu 1006). The extraction of oil and gas is susceptible to spillage or leakage, which may have devastating environmental repercussions to the surrounding areas. Crude oil requires being shipped to factories where it is converted to diesel, petrol, and gasoline. The transportation of crude oil to the refineries and its processing to the final products involve the use of energy from coal and other non-renewable sources, which contribute to environmental pollution. In other words, those opposed to the adoption of electric motors are ignorant of the environmental dangers attributed to crude oil.

Today, companies are shifting to the use of environmentally friendly materials to manufacture electric cars. For instance, the Ford Company uses recycled materials to manufacture its Ford Focus Electric (Font Vivanco et al. 12065). On the other hand, the bodywork and interiors of the Nissan Leaf are manufactured from eco-friendly materials like plastic bags and recycled water bottles (Font Vivanco et al. 12066). The propaganda being peddled by opponents of electric cars is meant to help oil companies to retain their profit. Increased use of electric cars will result in corporations losing many customers. The companies are not willing to let this happen while lying low and are determined to use all sorts of misinformation to tarnish the image of electric motors. They do not care about the impacts of fossil fuels on people’s health. One wonders if people can trust the information that comes from such companies.

Works Cited

Bockarjova, Marija, and Linda Steg. “Can Protection Motivation Theory Predict Pro-Environmental behavior? Explaining the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in the Netherlands,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 28, no. 1, 2014, pp. 276-288.

Buekers, Jurgen, et al. “Health and Environmental Benefits Related to Electric Vehicle Introduction in EU Countries.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 33, no. 1, 2014, pp. 26-38.

Holland, Stephen P., et al. “Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors.” American Economic Review, vol. 106, no. 12, 2016, pp. 3700-3729.

On-Time Delivery!
Get your customized and 100% plagiarism-free paper done in as little as 3 hours
Let’s start
322 specialists online

Manzetti, Sergio, and Florin Mariasiu. “Electric Vehicle Battery technologies: From Present State to Future Systems.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 51, no. 1, 2015, pp. 1004-1012.

Font Vivanco, David, et al. “The Remarkable Environmental Rebound Effect of Electric Cars: A Microeconomic Approach.” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 48, no. 20, 2014, pp. 12063-12072.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

Premium Papers. (2022, February 9). Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine. Retrieved from https://premium-papers.com/electric-motor-vs-gas-engine/

Reference

Premium Papers. (2022, February 9). Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine. https://premium-papers.com/electric-motor-vs-gas-engine/

Work Cited

"Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine." Premium Papers, 9 Feb. 2022, premium-papers.com/electric-motor-vs-gas-engine/.

References

Premium Papers. (2022) 'Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine'. 9 February.

References

Premium Papers. 2022. "Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine." February 9, 2022. https://premium-papers.com/electric-motor-vs-gas-engine/.

1. Premium Papers. "Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine." February 9, 2022. https://premium-papers.com/electric-motor-vs-gas-engine/.


Bibliography


Premium Papers. "Electric Motor vs. Gas Engine." February 9, 2022. https://premium-papers.com/electric-motor-vs-gas-engine/.