Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects

Misunderstanding gender as a culturally created role has generated concerns in many facets of the society. The confusion, which emerges between gender and sex, only worsens the situation. Gender encompasses the expression, communally created tasks, and emotional traits universally correlated with maleness or femaleness (Leaper, 2011). Every culture dispenses distinctive gender to either sex. On the contrary, sex is the biological make up of males and females including anatomy and physical appearance of maleness and femininity. The mystification of gender and sex apparently affects significant proportions of persons in the society. People experience gender in different ways thus affecting how they interact (Sudha, 2000). Misconstruing and stereotyping gender issues by men to insinuate that they are entirely women’s issues significantly affect men’s participation in gender related matters. It is highly plausible that perception on gender impinges on an individual’s habitual interactions in places of work, educational organization, and family matters. Perhaps, gender relations shape other facets of society together with income, welfare, productivity, and poverty.

Arguably, misunderstanding gender affects the learning sector. It seems that some communities allow many boys in comparison to girls to access education based on their opinion on gender. Additionally, gender misconstruction might affect learning process in educational institutions (Morris, 2011). During crises in societies, the effects significantly affect females since they are attributable to gender. This becomes grave in learning institutions as female students succumb to the pressure associated with such crises. Perhaps gender affects the status of male and women in diverse societies though this varies across traditions and era (Andersen & Taylor, 2007). Furthermore, arguments for defining status are linked to gender. Believably, status has gained usage in property ownership, equality, and productivity.

Apparently, gender affects workplaces in diverse ways including work characteristics performed by people. Arguably, workers perception on their supervisors is linked to gender. In addition, concerns arise from the biased allocation of duty to people and diverse composition of employees at workplaces (Roscigno, 2007). Maybe this is because employers consider gender in assigning duty while projecting certain level of output. Gender seemingly dictates wage apportionment to workers while focusing on their composition. There are also concerns that on job training costs for employees differ with the sex of the worker. Gender roles have gained usage in pairing workers to supervisors thus attaining a desired work output. Gender differences have also resulted in diverse actions against either sex at work including bigotry and aggravation (Paludi & Neidermeyer, 2007). This may be attributable to their gender inclination. In homes, gender roles influence the perception of males and females on the work they undertake. Apparently, the actions directed to either sex at home maybe due to their gender.

The ensuing problems emerging from misunderstanding gender results into unconstructive perceptions about gender issues. Many people subject men or women to diverse situations and settings because of lack of appreciation of gender thus generating varied impacts on individual’s lives. This situation necessitates a clearer understanding of the concept gender and its facets. This study hopes to enhance comprehension of gender concerns. Further, the study will validate gender as a role constructed by society and not biological sex. Furthermore, the study will seek to assess the consequences of gender roles misunderstanding on different facets of society. It will also improve the understanding of concepts using current examples that assume a direct correlation with gender.


Andersen, M. & Taylor, H. (2007). Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society. 4th Ed. California, CA: Cengage Learning.

Leaper, C. (2011). Research in Developmental Psychology on Gender and Relationships: Reflections on the Past and Looking Into the Future. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. Vol. 29: 347–356.

Morris, E. (2011). Bridging the Gap: ‘Doing Gender’, ‘Hegemonic Masculinity’, and the Educational Troubles of Boys. Sociology Compass. Vol. 5: 92–103.

Paludi, M. & Neidermeyer, P. (2007). Work, Life, and Family Imbalance: How to Level the Playing Field. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Roscigno, V. (2007).The Face of Discrimination: How Race and Gender Impact Work and Home Lives. Massachusetts, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Sudha, D. (2000). Gender roles. New Delhi: APH Publishing

Cite this paper

Select style


Premium Papers. (2022, December 27). Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects. Retrieved from


Premium Papers. (2022, December 27). Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects.

Work Cited

"Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects." Premium Papers, 27 Dec. 2022,


Premium Papers. (2022) 'Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects'. 27 December.


Premium Papers. 2022. "Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects." December 27, 2022.

1. Premium Papers. "Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects." December 27, 2022.


Premium Papers. "Gender as a Cultural Role. Main Aspects." December 27, 2022.