Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication

Abi-Jaoude, E., Naylor, K. T., & Pignatiello, A. (2020). Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192(6), 136-141. Web.

The given source primarily focuses on the effects of using smartphone technologies as well as social media platforms on younger generations on their mental health. It found that “social media can affect adolescents’ self-view and interpersonal relationships through social comparison and negative interactions, including cyberbullying” (Abi-Jaoude et al., 2020, p. 136). In other words, there is an array of problems caused by social media with respect to people. The source is highly relevant to the topic since it provides a comprehensive analysis of the collective impact of technology on people, especially the youth. The researchers and the journal of the Canadian Medical Association Journal are reliable and valid sources of scholarly information to substantiate the negative implications of the uncontrolled use of technology on mental well-being. These effects are especially detrimental among younger populations.

Dyer, T. (2018). The effects of social media on children. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 14, 1-16. Web.

The key purpose of the research was to analyze the impact of social media use among children when it comes to mental health. It further expands on the previous source by bringing more precise mental health effects and focusing on children and teens exclusively. It found that the effects include issues “such as depression, anxiety, and poor sleep. There is also a significant risk of children becoming targets of cyberbullying or sexting” (Dyer, 2018, p. 1). Since these effects are more significant among younger children and teens, people should be concerned about allowing a child to use these platforms. The source is highly relevant to the topic because it outlines how social media can be critically dangerous for children and adolescents when given without proper and up-close control of dosage, exposure, and use. The authors are experts in the field of child psychology and development, indicating a high level of validity and credibility of the source.

Hall, J. A., Dominguez, J., & Mihailova, T. (2022). Interpersonal media and face-to-face communication: Relationship with life satisfaction and loneliness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1-20. Web.

Unlike the two previous sources, the given study focuses on adults and the impact of technology use on face-to-face communication with an emphasis on life satisfaction and loneliness metrics. It suggests that the “number of relationship partners and frequency of face-to-face interaction were robust predictors of life satisfaction and loneliness. Those living alone faced significant threats to well-being” (Hall et al., 2022, p. 1). The reduction in life satisfaction means a decrease in the overall happiness human experience in their daily lives. The source is highly relevant and valid for the topic of interest since it complements the research on children and teens, indicating similar trends.

Kim, J. H. (2017). Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 282-291. Web.

The purpose of the study was to analyze how loneliness increases life dissatisfaction mediated by smartphone-mediated communication. The findings show that “those with a high level of loneliness tend to rely more on smartphone-mediated communication while being reluctant to engage in face-to-face interaction” (Kim, 2017, p. 282). Smartphones and the communication channels offered by them become preferable for lonely people, further facilitating their reduction in the life satisfaction metric. It is safe to assume that the quality of social support offered by social media is low, which makes the users more reluctant to reach out to others and seek human connection facilitating loneliness. The source is valid and reliable for the topic of interest since it outlines key metrics to measure when assessing the negative effects of technology on personal relationships.

Subramanian, K. R. (2017). Influence of social media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Scientific Progress and Research, 38(109), 70-75. Web.

The study’s key purpose was to understand how technology negatively affects the rate, frequency, and volume of personal relationships and face-to-face communication. It found that not only does the rate of personal relationships declines with the use of technology, but it promotes active avoidance as well (Subramanian, 2017). It is especially relevant to the topic of argument since there is an inherent value in connecting with someone interpersonally. Essentially, technology replaces interpersonal bonding by making people conditioned to rely solely on digital communication. The source has the highest degree of relevance, reliability, and validity for the topic because it precisely focuses on two key factors of interest, which include personal relationships and face-to-face communication.

Turp, M. J. (2020). Social media, interpersonal relations and the objective attitude. Ethics and Information Technology, 22, 269–279. Web.

The source analyzes the negative effects of technology on personal relationships and face-to-face communication from the point of emotional connection. It found that “social media make us more likely to adopt the objective attitude towards persons. Technologically mediated communication tends to inhibit interpersonal emotions and other reactive attitudes” (Turp, 2020, p. 269). Considering the fact that emotions are what makes people human, emotional depravity is not a positive development. It is relevant since the reduction of the emotional aspect of human bonding is a negative effect on personal relationships.

References

Abi-Jaoude, E., Naylor, K. T., & Pignatiello, A. (2020). Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192(6), 136-141. Web.

Dyer, T. (2018). The effects of social media on children. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 14, 1-16. Web.

Hall, J. A., Dominguez, J., & Mihailova, T. (2022). Interpersonal media and face-to-face communication: Relationship with life satisfaction and loneliness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1-20. Web.

Kim, J. H. (2017). Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 282-291. Web.

Subramanian, K. R. (2017). Influence of social media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Scientific Progress and Research, 38(109), 70-75. Web.

Turp, M. J. (2020). Social media, interpersonal relations and the objective attitude. Ethics and Information Technology, 22, 269–279. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

Premium Papers. (2024, January 28). Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication. https://premium-papers.com/technological-impact-on-relationships-and-communication/

Work Cited

"Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication." Premium Papers, 28 Jan. 2024, premium-papers.com/technological-impact-on-relationships-and-communication/.

References

Premium Papers. (2024) 'Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication'. 28 January.

References

Premium Papers. 2024. "Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication." January 28, 2024. https://premium-papers.com/technological-impact-on-relationships-and-communication/.

1. Premium Papers. "Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication." January 28, 2024. https://premium-papers.com/technological-impact-on-relationships-and-communication/.


Bibliography


Premium Papers. "Technological Impact on Relationships and Communication." January 28, 2024. https://premium-papers.com/technological-impact-on-relationships-and-communication/.